Style is based in imitation. As unromantic as it sounds, this copycat tendency is within human nature. We hope to emulate the ideas and individuals we admire. Fashion publication “how-to’s” provide us with the tools to create our imitation: “How to accessorize,” “How to dress for evening,” “How to wear leather…pastels…lace…” The list goes on.

Our study of imitation, whether through fashion magazines or our own observation, teaches us to recognize patterns: “Skinny pants with flowy tops,” “loose dresses with a belted waist,” etc. These patterns are the components of our mechanical style toolbox, and nothing more. They are merely the ability to know what-goes-with-what, what flatters and what doesn’t, etc.

Therefore, the toolbox is the basis of style, but nothing without its counterpart that makes style personal: your tastes and sensibilities, which, with care and use of the tools, can blossom into an aesthetic. But fashion magazines and/or habitual observation of patterns can only provide you with one half of the equation, leaving many unaware of their mechanical approach to a potentially imaginative style.

We managed to inch closer to this uncharted territory by simply establishing a clear difference between the toolbox and the aesthetic. The looks we’ve created each incorporate the current trends seen in this season’s iconic runway looks, but differ in their approach. While one strictly captures the mechanics of the look, the other is loyal only to the aesthetic – leaving room for personal variation.

If style-conscious individuals are able to infuse each of these approaches into their own dress, mastering both the toolbox and the aesthetic, their personal expression through style will be limitless. Now that’s a “how-to.” (Cheaper alternatives to runway wear can be found at Urban Outfitters, Top Shop and South Moon Under!)